ELP has introduced and has succeeded in maintaining an agile review process. However, we encourage you to follow the author’s guidelines and the ELP template . Proper submission would facilitate the entire process.
- Name and email of at least 1 suggested reviewer (required)
- Please allow the very short period for review process to finish. Due to the reviewers` efficiency ELP provides and promotes fast review procedure.
- Recommended article length is 07-20 pages.
- All articles must follow our template in Microsoft Word.
- You can submit your manuscripts online via e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com
- Submissions are considered on the basis of scientific validity and technical quality, not perceived impact.
- Accept the manuscript as submitted;
- Accept it with minor revision;
- Accept it with major revision; and
- Reject the manuscript because it does not meet the journal criteria.
The call for papers is ongoing. For detailed time framework click here.
Plagiarism is not acceptable in the ELP submissions and publications. With the submission, authors declare the originality of their work by properly citing, re-using, or copying previous publications. If plagiarism is detected during the peer review process, the manuscript would be rejected. If plagiarism is detected after publication, the publisher has the right to issue a correction or retract of the paper.
The editorial office is participating in a growing community of CrossCheck System’s users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. CrossCheck is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. Detailed description of the CrossCheck System can be found at: http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck/index.html
As of May 2016 ELP uses Portico as an archiving solution. Portico is among the largest community-supported digital archives in the world. Working with libraries and publishers, they preserve e-journals, e-books, and other electronic scholarly content to ensure researchers and students will have access to it in the future.
Moreover, along the online content, every ELP edition appears in print version. It also represents a preservation solution. Thousands of hard copies have been disseminated to Universities and individuals around the world.
Authors can publish their articles and book reviews, after a review by our editorial board. Our mission is to provide greater and faster flow of the newest scientific thought. ELP’s role is to be a kind of a bridge between the educational sciences researchers in Europe and around the world. The “European Journal of Economics, Law and Politics” (ELP) is open to any researchers, regardless of their geographical origin, race, nationality, religion or gender as long as they have an adequate scientific paper. ELP encourages a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. “European Journal of Economics, Law and Politics” (ELP) publishes original empirical and theoretical studies and analyses in education that constitute significant contributions to the understanding of educational processes and outcomes. Original research is interpreted broadly to include policy analyses, development of research methodologies and reviews of research that contribute new insights and understandings.
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice
The “European Journal of Economics, Law and Politics” (ELP) is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. All authors submitting their works to the “ELP” for publication as original articles attest that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works. The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed all and any actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or partial benefits associated with it. In the same manner, the “ELP” is committed to objective and fair peer – review of the submitted for publication works and to prevent any actual or potential conflict of interests between the editorial and review personnel and the reviewed material. Any departures from the above-defined rules should be reported directly to the Editor-in-Chief, who is unequivocally committed to providing swift resolutions to any of such a type of problems.